I am not sure. I was a little chagrined that I didn't even notice it until the bus was practically pulling up, and there were so many people waiting at the stop that I had to get over camera shyness to take the pic. I certainly wasn't fully awake, heh.
Speaking of 9-12-01 memories, I distinctly recall walking outside my office on that morning, looking up and seeing a complete, 360-degree circular rainbow. I'd never seen one before, and haven't seen one since.
Fascinating. It should be impossible to see a full circle rainbow from the ground. Was the rainbow around the sun or opposite the sun? Was there ice or water on the ground?
Seems to me, if memory serves, that it was reasonably sunny and dry (although around here early-morning misty fog is common in September) and definitely not cold or icy. I want to say it was more around the sun than opposite it. It would have been in the northeastern part of the sky, probably around 10 or 10:30 in the morning, which is when I normally take a break and go outside.
Went out and looked and found this. It would be possible that there may have been some high-level ice crystal activity going on, even though it was still shirt-sleeve weather here (September in Indiana).
"On days in the spring where it is still cold enough that there are high-altitude ice crystals, you can sometimes look up an noon and see a rainbow that goes all the way around the sun. This is extremely rare.
More generally we see things like sun-dogs, which are refractive rainbows made by clouds to either side of the sun. These are pretty common."
Don't know which it might have ben, but it was cool. Now I wish I'd had a camera that day.
Wow, I think all of that explains it: cirrus or cirrostratus clouds (like in entelein's photo, a relatively high sun (10:30am), and a complete circle around the sun. Sounds like a rainbow-colored halo; those are rare. Usually, halos are white. You were looking the right way at just the right time for that.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-08 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-08 02:55 pm (UTC)It so looks like drunken clone tool usage, doesn't it?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-08 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-08 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-08 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-08 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-08 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-08 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-08 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-08 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-08 04:06 pm (UTC)It *is* a very nice shot, BTW. Your photography always has a certain symmetry to it.
Wolf
no subject
Date: 2006-08-08 04:15 pm (UTC)What can I say? I like the sky. ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 12:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-08 04:44 pm (UTC)-- Steve doesn't see that washboard effect too often. Sure is pretty.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 12:49 am (UTC)That reminds me of September 12, 2001: No contrails in the sky at all, for a change.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 04:36 pm (UTC)Wolf
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 05:37 pm (UTC)Wolf
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 05:48 pm (UTC)"On days in the spring where it is still cold enough that there are high-altitude ice crystals, you can sometimes look up an noon and see a rainbow that goes all the way around the sun. This is extremely rare.
More generally we see things like sun-dogs, which are refractive rainbows made by clouds to either side of the sun. These are pretty common."
Don't know which it might have ben, but it was cool. Now I wish I'd had a camera that day.
Wolf
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 05:52 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_%28optical_phenomenon%29
http://mkwc.ifa.hawaii.edu/glossary/index.cgi?letter=c
no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-09 02:48 am (UTC)